3 Common Practices that Motivational Speaker Success Says are Wrong

What are the words that first come to your mind when you think about motivational speaking? Fame? Influence? Money? Best-selling books? Personal assistants? Private jets? Fans? Oprah Winfrey perhaps? What are the names that you first associate with motivational speaking? Tony Robbins? Les Brown? Eric Thomas? The duo of Jack Canfield and Mark Victor of the Chicken Soup fame? The late Zig Ziglar and Steve Jobs maybe?

We tend to think about the famous personalities and all of the benefits that come with being insanely popular when we talk about motivational speaking. They are the pinnacle of the profession, after all. However, we, at motivational-speaker-success.com, find it bothering that most people only see the good things of entering the world of public speaking. Expectations become higher, which, as a result, make disappointments harder to bear.

It is absolutely fine to keep your hopes up and take the same path that successful motivational speakers have taken in the past. However, you need to stay realistic when practicing the profession. Emulate the authorities without overestimating your current abilities and knowledge. Find the patterns that led others to success without forgetting to stop and look back to see if they are really the right way to excel in your field of expertise. Motivational-speaker-success.com believes that what works really well for one motivational speaker may not be the same for another.Motivational Speaker

Let us help you find the best path by revealing common motivational speaking practices that we think are wrong.
1. Assuming that the audience know what you are talking about.

It works with stand-up comedians simply because they can elicit laughter from the audience’s inability to grasp the situation. For motivational speakers though, it can confuse them.

Do not leave out some detail and act like you are surprised to see confused faces in the audience whenever you are sharing a story, telling a fact, or recounting something that you have already told in past speaking engagements. Speak for the most confused person in the venue, not for the smartest one.

2. Using “canned” speech for several events.

This was the practice even of established and popular motivational speakers before the era of social media. Why not? There was very limited means for people to know what had already been told verbatim in prior events.

Nowadays though, preparing a one-speech-fits-all script is no longer recommended regardless if your events are too private for public sharing. There are a lot of ways for people to discover your originality—or lack of it—other than video sharing. You can be discussed in the social media and what could have been a great opportunity to launch referral marketing may turn out to be a big mistake.

Becoming busy with multiple speaking engagements is not an excuse to use canned speech all the time. In fact, it is a sign that you should have started to hire your own team of writers and researchers. The core messages should come from you, but there is no need to hog all the tasks, from proofreading to information validating.

The least you can do is revise one speech in ways that it becomes relevant to your particular audience. That still demands some amount of research and validation so may as well start anew.

3. Working for eight hours a day.

A lot of followers and regular visitors of our site, motivational-speaker-success.com, think that becoming a motivational speaker gives them the freedom to use their time however they want to. That is where they are wrong.

Working for eight hours a day will delay your income by six to nine months. That leaves you with one whole year of waiting to find a return-client and two full years of waiting before you become financially stable.

Becoming a motivational speaker is like becoming a start-up businessman. You should be working longer, earlier in the morning, and later in the evening because you have a lot of things to learn, do, relearn, undo, and discover only to make your workload heavier.

Even before you start getting booked one event after another, you’ll have to do a lot of research to master your field of expertise, market yourself to your target audience, look for leads and platforms to reach them, earn exposure and publicity, and write materials.

The first six months will be filled with trial and error, so your prior efforts may no longer mean anything eventually.There are a lot of wrong practices that you still have to learn. What is right today may no longer be right tomorrow. You have to be constantly updated, and one of the best ways to do that is by visiting our site, motivational-speaker-success.com, regularly.

SARMS

The acronym SARMs stands for “Selective Androgen Receptor Modulators.” They bind with androgens and act in a similar manner as androgenic drugs like anabolic steroids (ex., testosterone). However, they are more selective than anabolic steroids; thus, they have less uses than these steroids. On the other hand, their selectivity means that they are safer to use than steroids.

The Science behind the Molecule

Selective Androgen Receptor Modulators refer to a group of androgen receptor ligands. This means that they bind with androgens. The ligand/androgen pair then travels to the cell’s nucleus and signals it to start gene transcription. This gene transcription may result in increased production of proteins and certain molecules, depending on which genes are stimulated.

Steroidal versions of this molecule were first studied in the 1940s and were based on a testosterone model. Today, non-steroidal versions of this group have been produced by independent pharmaceutical companies. These include cyclic quinolinones and aryl propinoamides, which exhibit anabolic activity on skeletal muscles as well as tissue selectivity.

Anabolic activity refers to the synthesis of complex molecules from simpler molecules while storing energy (“anabolism”). Anabolic steroids and hormones help produce proteins in cells, which contribute to muscle building.

SARMSDrugs that are able to stimulate or block hormone receptors in specific conditions are called “selective receptor modulators.” This mimics the beneficial effects of synthetic and natural steroids in a specific tissue without causing unwanted harm to other tissues. One such drug is SARMs. They give the same benefits as Anabolic Androgenic Steroids (like testosterone) but are less likely to produce unwanted side effects. They can cause fat loss, increased muscle mass, or increased bone density in particular tissues without affecting others.

Their Importance

Steroids are often prescribed for muscle degeneration or for hormone replacement therapy. However, there could be several unwanted side-effects to steroid intake. This is why alternative molecules are being researched by pharmaceutical companies.

Anabolic Androgenic Steroids can cause following:
•    Prostate cancer stimulation
•    Acne
•    Over-stimulation of hair growth
•    Breast development in males
•    Male pattern baldness
•    High blood pressure
•    Cholesterol imbalance
•    Liver toxicity
•    Growth of the left ventricle of the heart
•    Impairment of the body’s natural testosterone production

In comparison, stimulating the androgen receptors in muscle or bone only can prevent these side effects.

The benefits associated with these selective androgen receptors are:
•    Can be taken orally
•    Prevention of muscle loss during weight loss
•    Growth of lean muscles
•    Rehabilitation after injury
•    Post-cycle therapy after anabolic use (they can restore normal testosterone levels in the body)
•    Anabolic effects even with low dosage
•    Help in aerobic and anaerobic endurance
•    Heals joint injuries
•    Doesn’t significantly damage the liver
•    Ideal for Androgen Replacement Therapy, especially in cases of osteoporosis and muscle wasting

Androgen Replacement Therapy

Hormone replacementCurrently, oral androgen replacements are rather limited. There are two commonly used forms: Andriol, which is considered expensive and ineffective, and Methyl testosterone, which can damage the liver. SARMs can be a good alternative to these, since it can also be taken orally and still produce beneficial effects without resulting in liver toxicity.

Many types of SARMs are presently undergoing development. They have different androgenic and anabolic activity, as well as varying potential side effects. Generally, though, most produce few side effects and have anabolic profiles similar to testosterone. The one furthest along, Ostarine, is at the third and final stage for clinical development.

SARMs were banned for a few years by the World Anti-Doping Agency, but efforts are underway for developing testing protocols for them. They have a relatively short half life, unique structures, and a short research history. These characteristics present a complex problem to many doping authorities.